Harness Hub

Compare · popular comparison

OpenClaw vs Hermes Agent

Facts from the directory and the knowledge graph, with pros and cons that cite their sources. Add another entry to change the line-up.

OpenClaw vs Hermes Agent. Rows marked Differs have different values.

Open source

OpenClaw

Remove

Open source

Hermes Agent

Remove

TypeOpen sourceOpen source
CategoriesDiffers
In one lineThe viral open-source personal AI assistant that really does things.The agent that grows with you.
Stage & funding——
GitHub starsDiffers≈393k≈258k
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
Last pushOct 28, 2026Oct 28, 2026
Works with——
Built on——
Built on itDiffers—
Similar toDiffers—
People linkedDiffers71
EventsDiffers
Pros
  • User reportsUsers run it as an always-on assistant with its own email and phone identity for coordinating people and tasks.[1][2]
  • User reportsIt stores memory as plain files, so switching models or agents is easy, and many others copied concepts such as SOUL.md.[1][2]
  • User reportsReddit users cite breadth as the draw: 24+ channels, per-agent personas, deterministic cron and a large skill ecosystem.[1]
  • MetadataMIT-licensed and the most-starred project in the category (about 393k), with dated releases roughly weekly (v2026.10.8 on Oct 27, 2026).[1]
  • User reportsUsers who switched from OpenClaw found it more reliable and easier to configure, with better defaults.[1][2][3]
  • User reportsIt turns completed tasks into reusable skills and checkpoints the working directory with /rollback.[1]
  • User reportsMemory is portable and file-based with pluggable providers, so moving between agents is easy.[1][2]
  • MetadataMIT-licensed and very active (about 258k stars, v0.22.5 released Oct 23, 2026).[1]
Cons
  • Independent testWeak security track record: multiple CVEs, 341 malicious ClawHub skills found in the ClawHavoc campaign and many publicly exposed instances.[1][2]
  • User reportsUpdates frequently break things, the top r/openclaw complaint, and users report crashes while it configures itself.[1][2]
  • User reportsAnthropic and Google restricted using their subscriptions with OpenClaw, which pushes users to pay-per-token API keys.[1][2]
  • MetadataThousands of open GitHub issues and PRs, and reports of runaway token bills and unsafe autonomous actions.[1][2]
  • MetadataTens of thousands of open issues and PRs, and some users see the codebase as mostly LLM-generated.[1][2]
  • User reportsA user found the default load-out enables so many skills that listing them costs over 10k tokens.[1]
  • User reportsReddit users say it overrates its own work, so learned skills can encode errors, and that it overwrites manual skill edits.[1]
  • User reportsIt carries the usual always-on agent risks; users isolate it on separate VLANs or VMs.[1][2]
Best forTinkerers who want the broadest always-on personal agent with many channels and skills, run in an isolated environment.Home-lab and personal-assistant users who want a self-improving agent with simpler setup than OpenClaw.
Watch out forTreat ClawHub skills as untrusted code, never expose the gateway publicly, and pin versions, because updates often break.Review auto-generated skills before trusting them, and trim the default skill set to save context.
Links