Harness Hub

Compare · popular comparison

Cursor (Anysphere) vs Zed

Facts from the directory and the knowledge graph, with pros and cons that cite their sources. Add another entry to change the line-up.

Cursor (Anysphere) vs Zed. Rows marked Differs have different values.

Startup

Cursor (Anysphere)

Remove

Startup

Zed

Remove

TypeStartupStartup
CategoriesDiffers
In one lineThe AI-native code editor where agent mode lives.High-performance, multiplayer code editor; open source, AI optional
Stage & fundingDiffersGrowth · ~$29B valuation (late 2025)—
GitHub stars——
License——
Language——
Last push——
Works with——
Built onDiffers—
Built on it——
Similar to——
People linkedDiffers42
Events00
Pros
  • User reportsCloud Agents are widely praised and built into team workflows such as support triage and alert handling.[1][2]
  • User reportsAuto-review run mode plus sandboxing means fewer permission prompts.[1]
  • User reportsThe in-house Composer models are reported as good for simpler tasks, and plan-then-execute model routing works well.[1][2]
Not yet assessed
Cons
  • DocsIts June 2025 pricing switch caused surprise charges, which led to a public apology and refunds.[1][2]
  • User reportsToken-rate costs pushed teams to buy Claude or Codex directly; one team reported spending $2K a week.[1][2]
  • User reportsUsers report bugs, many unanswered GitHub issues, and an AI support bot that made up a lockout policy.[1][2]
  • User reportsSpaceX's reported $60B deal to buy Cursor's parent Anysphere (June 2026), placing it under xAI, raises questions about product direction.[1]
Not yet assessed
Best forTeams that want a polished AI IDE with cloud agents and accept usage-based spend.—
Watch out forFast-rising per-token costs and post-acquisition product direction.—
Links

Popular comparisons