Harness Hub

The directory · side by side

Compare

Line up two to four entries and see where they differ. The link in your address bar shares this exact comparison.

Claude Code vs Factory. Rows marked Differs have different values.

Open source

Claude Code

Remove

Startup

Factory

Remove

TypeDiffersOpen sourceStartup
Categories
In one lineAnthropic's agentic coding tool for the terminal, IDE and GitHub.Droids: AI workers for software teams.
Stage & funding——
GitHub starsDiffers≈154k—
LicenseDiffersProprietary (Anthropic Commercial Terms)—
LanguageDiffersTypeScript—
Last push——
Works with——
Built on——
Built on itDiffers—
Similar to——
People linkedDiffers32
EventsDiffers
Pros
  • User reportsUsers widely see it as the strongest overall agent with Opus-class models, and strong with skills, hooks and LSPs.[1][2]
  • User reportsRich built-in harness features (subagents, skills, hooks, plugins, headless mode) that other tools can call into.[1][2]
  • User reportsUsers report the flat Max subscription covers far more usage than the same work would cost at API prices.[1][2]
  • MetadataVery fast release cadence (v2.1.312 on Oct 27, 2026).[1]
  • DocsFactory's Droid agent posted a leading 58.75% on Terminal-Bench when Factory published the result.[1]
  • DocsThe $20/month Pro plan bundles the Factory app, Droid CLI, Droid SDK, local and cloud background agents and Managed Droid Computers.[1]
  • DocsBYOK is free up to an allowance on all individual plans, and a free pool of open-weight models (Droid Core) stays available after standard usage runs out.[1]
  • DocsExtra-usage credits are prepaid with a $10 minimum and never expire.[1]
Cons
  • User reportsUsage caps and quota changes are a recurring complaint, and people fall back to Codex or OpenCode.[1][2]
  • User reportsUsers measure heavy base context: about 33k tokens before your prompt vs about 7k for OpenCode.[1][2]
  • MetadataSubscriptions can't be used in third-party harnesses, and the CLI has no OSI open-source license; use falls under Anthropic's commercial terms.[1][2]
  • MetadataAbout 16k open GitHub issues and PRs, plus trust worries after the March 2026 source leak.[1][2]
  • DocsThree independent rolling rate-limit windows (5-hour, 7-day and 30-day) govern usage, and Missions require Extra Usage and pause when they hit a limit.[1]
  • Independent testPricing has changed sharply, from $80/user token-metered tiers in early 2025 to rate-limited seats starting at $20, which makes long-term cost planning harder.[1]
  • Independent testBenchmark standing depends on the underlying model: one comparison lists Droid at 58.8% with Opus 4.1 and 52.5% with GPT-5 (medium).[1]
  • MetadataThe agent is proprietary, unlike open-source CLIs such as Aider or OpenCode, so you cannot self-host or audit it.[1]
Best forDevelopers who want the most capable out-of-the-box coding agent with Claude models and a deep extension surface.Engineering teams that want one model-agnostic coding agent across CLI, IDE and background cloud runs.
Watch out forYou are locked to Anthropic's quotas and terms; plan for usage caps and measure the context overhead.Long Missions can hit the rolling rate limits and run up Extra Usage charges.
Links

Popular comparisons