Harness Hub
All startups

Trigger.dev

Open-source durable runtime for building and deploying AI agents and workflows in TypeScript.

Trigger.dev is an open-source (Apache-2.0) platform for long-running AI agents and workflows in TypeScript. Tasks run without timeouts and get durability via checkpointing, retries, queues, concurrency controls, idempotency and versioned deploys, plus human-in-the-loop waitpoints, Realtime streaming of LLM output to frontends, cron schedules and per-run tracing and logs. Its chat agents are pitched as surviving refreshes, redeploys and crashes. It can be used as a managed cloud with usage-based pricing or self-hosted. In December 2025 the company announced a $16M Series A led by Standard Capital with participation from Y Combinator.

Pros & cons

Each point cites its sources and says what kind of evidence backs it. A second reviewer tried to refute every claim before it was kept.

Pros

  • MetadataApache-2.0 and very actively maintained: about 16.6k GitHub stars and commits on 29 Oct 2026.[1]
  • DocsCompute is billed only while tasks execute. Waits on subtasks, and wait.for/wait.until waits longer than 5 seconds, are checkpointed and not charged, which suits long-running agent jobs.[1]
  • User reportsOne customer runs its agents and background jobs on Trigger.dev and says preview branching lets coding agents build and verify features in parallel.[1]
  • User reportsAnother customer building AI automation on TypeScript says it scaled with little effort and cost less than self-hosting on a VPS.[1][2]

Cons

  • DocsThe free tier gives $5 of compute a month, 20 concurrent runs and only 1 day of log retention.[1]
  • DocsSelf-hosted deployments lack warm starts, auto-scaling, checkpoints and dedicated support (Discord community only), and logs are never deleted.[1]
  • Docsv3 is end of life: 4.5.1 and later reject v3 triggers and deploys, so older projects must migrate to v4.[1]
  • DocsConcurrency beyond the Pro plan's 200 runs costs $10/month per 50, and every plan is limited to 1,500 API requests per minute unless you ask for more.[1]
Best for
TypeScript teams that want managed, durable background jobs and agent runs without running their own queue or worker fleet.
Watch out for
Price out concurrency and log retention, and know that self-hosting gives up warm starts, autoscaling and checkpoints.

Assessed Oct 29, 2026 · adversarially reviewedSuggest a correction

People

E2B

Open-source sandboxes for running AI-generated code.

E2B gives agents secure, isolated cloud micro-VMs to execute code and commands — the execution runtime layer of the harness, used by many coding and data-analysis agents.

4 pros · 3 cons

Elastic sandboxes for running AI-generated code.

Daytona provides secure, OCI-compatible sandbox 'computers' that spin up in under 90ms — with snapshots for persistent agent state. In 2026 it moved core development to a private codebase while continuing to run as a commercial platform.

3 pros · 4 cons

Serverless cloud built for AI and agentic compute.

Modal lets teams run inference, fine-tuning and arbitrary agent workloads as serverless Python without managing infrastructure — a common substrate for harness backends at scale.

4 pros · 4 cons

Connections

Relations from the Harness Hub knowledge graph, as charted in the State of Harness reports.

Similar entries · 1

Sources

  1. GitHub README
  2. Trigger.dev website
  3. Trigger.dev raises $16M Series A