StartupEst. 2018 · Series B

Qodo

Multi-agent code review and quality governance for AI-written code.

Qodo builds a code review and governance layer for agent-written software. Its platform runs multiple specialized review agents on pull requests, with a coordinating layer that filters and prioritizes findings, plus cross-repo review, a software map of service dependencies, a codebase knowledge base and an 'Agentic Toolbox' CLI that gives coding agents such as Codex, Claude and Kiro a quality counterpart inside their loop. In March 2026 it raised a $70M Series B led by Qumra Capital, bringing total funding to $120M.

Visit qodo.ai View on GitHub

Pros & cons

Each point cites its sources and says what kind of evidence backs it. A second reviewer tried to refute every claim before it was kept.

Pros

MetadataIts open-source PR-Agent reviewer (MIT, about 13.7K stars) can be self-hosted with your own LLM keys and supports GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps and Gitea.[1][2]
DocsQodo 2.0 uses a multi-agent review architecture with separate expert agents for distinct review responsibilities.[1]
DocsThe hosted product works across GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and Azure DevOps, and offers free access to qualifying open-source projects.[1][2]

Cons

User reportsSeveral teams say Qodo and CodeRabbit produce so much noise that they replaced them with thin in-house wrappers over Claude or Codex.[1][2]
MetadataPR-Agent's README calls it a community-maintained legacy project distinct from Qodo's main review product, so the open-source path lags the SaaS.[1]
Independent testIn a community benchmark PR-Agent found only 2 of 8 seeded issues, and it did not support the newest model.[1]
Independent testHosted pricing is credit-metered, and third-party listings disagree on seat prices and whether a free tier exists.[1][2]
User reportsQodo's own code-review benchmark was questioned on HN for treating merged PRs as ground truth.[1]

Best for: Teams that want multi-host AI PR review with an open-source, self-hostable fallback.
Watch out for: Review noise, and the gap between the community PR-Agent and the paid Qodo platform.

Assessed Oct 29, 2026 · adversarially reviewedSuggest a correction

People

Itamar Friedman

Co-founder & CEO

Comparisons & reviews

Dedy Kredo

Co-founder & Chief Product Officer

Comparisons & reviews

In research (1)

Securing Agent-Generated Code with Its Own Development HistoryVerdict: Useful
Oct 25, 2026 · AI code review and quality governance for agent-written code, the problem space Tracer targets.

San Francisco, CA · Est. 2022

Featured

LangChain

The de-facto standard toolkit for building LLM applications and agents.

LangChain makes the LangChain framework and LangGraph, the low-level orchestration standard for stateful, controllable agents, plus the LangSmith platform for tracing, evaluating and monitoring them in production.

~$75M raised

4 pros · 4 cons

San Francisco, CA · Est. 2023

Featured

Cognition

Devin, the AI software engineer, and the Windsurf IDE.

Cognition builds Devin, an autonomous AI software engineer that plans and executes engineering tasks end-to-end, and acquired the Windsurf agentic IDE in 2025. One of the defining startups of the coding-agent wave.

~$10.2B valuation (Sep 2025)

3 pros · 4 cons

San Francisco, CA · Est. 2023

Braintrust

Enterprise-grade evals, data and AI gateway.

Braintrust turns prompts and agent traces into testable datasets and CI, plus an inference gateway — helping teams measure whether harness changes actually improve agent quality.